Follow the source
Investigate substantial documentary matters. Inspect supporting and conflicting material, chronology and gaps.
Explore source-linked investigation →For UK law firms · substantial documentary matters
Source-linked legal intelligence. Supervised legal teamwork.
Investigate the evidence. Connect junior preparation to its sources. Keep solicitor review and professional decisions visible.
Analyse the recordTest propositionsFind contradictionsExpose gapsPropose next workSupervise junior work
Explore without signing in. Demonstrations use fictional material. AI-assisted work requires professional review.
1:36 · Start with the overview
Three connected capabilities
Evidence, teamwork and review in one matter.
Give junior work a clear route
Connect assigned preparation to original evidence, correction requests and versioned submissions.
Explore Junior Workspace →Keep professional decisions visible
Distinguish AI assistance, junior preparation and human review. Inspect the evidence before relying on the work.
Review governance and assurance →FEATURED WORKFLOW · JUNIOR WORKSPACE
Supervised junior legal work, connected to its evidence.
From task assignment and source inspection to a qualified note, corrections and supervisor review—within the existing governed matter workspace.
Shown using a fictional training matter. Professional approval is separate.
A practical evaluation journey
See it. Question it. Then decide.
1. Explore without signing in
Follow a fictional evidence conflict and its recorded review route. No upload or client material.
Explore the synthetic example →2. Request a focused walkthrough
Choose source investigation, junior supervision or governance. We arrange application access separately.
Request a walkthrough →3. Agree a controlled evaluation
Set the workflow, assurance requirements and success criteria before deciding whether a pilot fits.
Review the evaluation approach →Independent practising-solicitor validation, measured productivity savings and security certification are not claimed.
Explore detailed capabilities, evidence and assurance
An evidence-led decision for solicitors
The practical test: can an unfamiliar documentary matter be investigated while keeping contradictory material, sources and professional decisions visible?
Ask a hard question
Find the documents that support and undermine a disputed proposition, plus uncertainties and unanswered questions.
Verify the originals
Check context, provenance, dates and missing sources, not just plausible quotations.
Decide on evidence
Assess professional usefulness, costs and the security gates before confidential material is introduced.
Independent practising-solicitor acceptance and independent security clearance are not yet claimed.
Document lineage · connected evidence
When a document changes, see what needs review.
Revised contracts, amended reports and competing drafts can affect the work built on them. LegalRAG Pro connects document versions while preserving the original sources and citations, helping your team inspect the consequences of an approved version relationship.
Connect the versions
Record which document revises or supersedes another. Review suggested relationships before approval, and keep competing branches visible.
Preserve the evidence
Keep earlier sources, their hashes and citations available for inspection. A newer version does not erase the evidential record.
Inspect downstream impact
Check recorded links from the predecessor's evidence to issues, chronology, findings, tasks and drafts, so the team can decide what needs review.
Watch Document Lineage · 3:32 →
Practitioner approval controls document relationships. Impact analysis is read-only; it does not automatically update case work or determine a document's legal effect.
New: Document Change Impact
When evidence changes, see the connected work that may need review.
A revised source can affect a legal issue — and tasks linked to that issue, even when the tasks do not cite the source directly. LegalRAG Pro highlights these indirect issue-to-task connections alongside directly linked review items, without inventing direct citations or changing approved conclusions.
- 1. Document revisionAn amended report or revised contract
- 2. Affected evidenceSource-linked material connected to the earlier version
- 3. Legal issues and tasksDirect and indirect review candidates are distinguished
- 4. Professional reviewThe solicitor checks and decides what changes
Read-only impact analysis; no automatic legal conclusions or task approvals. Controlled synthetic acceptance has passed; a complete populated-matter authenticated browser demonstration remains to be verified.
A connected working method
From the documentary record to work you can review.
Understand the record
Connect documents, chronology, people and issues. Keep supporting, qualifying and contradictory evidence visible.
Investigate the questions
Use Ask for bounded questions and Case Operator for defined investigations. Inspect the sources and the limits of the returned work.
Review the next action
Carry work into tasks, drafts and reports. The solicitor decides what is accepted, relied on, circulated or filed.
Source linkage supports checking. It does not make an AI conclusion automatically correct.
Explore the litigation workflows
Source-linked legal AI software for the work behind a case.
LegalRAG Pro helps solicitors and litigation teams investigate substantial documentary matters while keeping source material, uncertainty and professional decisions visible. Explore the capabilities that matter to your team.
- Legal AI for litigation →Investigate legal issues, chronology and conflicting evidence within a supervised matter workflow.
- Litigation document review →Find and inspect relevant source material, contradictions and documentary gaps.
- AI case chronology software →Build working case timelines linked to the documents and issues behind each event.
- Evidence analysis for solicitors →Trace support and qualification for propositions before relying on AI-assisted findings.
All AI-assisted findings and working outputs require legal practitioner review. These descriptions do not claim automated legal correctness.
The business case for litigation teams
Understand the potential return before you buy.
Explore how supervised, source-linked work could increase team capacity. Review illustrative economics and the six-week evidence-led pilot proposal—not unverified savings claims.
Financial scenarios are illustrative, not independently measured LegalRAG Pro results.
Professional control
The lawyer remains responsible for the work.
Source checking, supervision and confidentiality matter throughout an AI-assisted workflow. LegalRAG Pro keeps source evidence, proposed work and professional decisions distinguishable.
The SRA's 17 August 2026 warning notice provides the regulatory context. LegalRAG Pro does not claim SRA approval, certification or automatic compliance.
Finance inside the matter
Keep the financial evidence and calculation route visible.
Review historical financials, comparables, deterministic calculations, source evidence and limitations alongside the legal record. Core arithmetic is performed in code, and Finance AI works against frozen authority.
Confidentiality & data protection
Protect the matter before AI work begins.
LegalRAG Pro uses layered controls for confidential documentary work and states the remaining assurance limits openly.
Encrypted storage & backup
Production matter storage is encrypted at rest. Encrypted off-site backup is in place, and an isolated restore of backed-up application data has been successfully verified.
Controlled access
TLS protects traffic to the application. Authentication, an application admission allowlist, matter membership and roles are used to restrict who can reach each matter.
AI provider boundary
LegalRAG Pro sends governed OpenAI API requests with store=False, and API training use is disabled. Under the current standard profile, abuse-monitoring logs may retain customer content for up to 30 days. Zero Data Retention has been requested from OpenAI but is not yet approved or claimed.
Confidential or privileged client use remains subject to a controlled pilot, appropriate customer data-protection arrangements and independent security assurance. No Zero Data Retention claim is made until OpenAI approval is enabled and evidenced.
Choose a first view
See the capability that matters to your team.
1:36
Connected matter overview
A concise introduction to the working method.
Watch the overview →
3:32
Document lineage
Versions, preserved evidence and downstream impact.
Watch document lineage →
3:56
Governance and review
Review controls and the professional decision.
Watch governance →Watch the full practitioner workflow · 9:11 → or choose from the ten focused workflows →.
short case challenge
You inherit 40 documents and four live issues. Where do you look first?
Choose an issue. LegalRAG does not reward the “right” answer; it shows what the current evidence state says and what still needs professional attention.
Evidence incomplete
The missing dates become work, not invented certainty.
The synthetic matter records missing ACAS and claim-presentation dates as an explicit task. The issue is visible as incomplete rather than being smoothed into a confident answer.
Disputed
The chronology is useful because it preserves disagreement.
The record moves through occupational-health advice, adjustment discussions, attendance requirements, capability concerns and disputed meeting material. The task is to inspect what supports, qualifies or contradicts the proposed account.
Comparatively well supported
Support is not the same as automatic legal correctness.
The frozen synthetic report records stronger support for employer knowledge than for some other issues. LegalRAG keeps the evidence route available so the solicitor can verify what the assessment rests on.
Synthetic demonstration status only. These are working evidential positions, not legal determinations.
A practical first step
Start with a synthetic matter, focused on your team's work.
Book a practitioner walkthrough to explore source review, document lineage, investigation or Finance. Then agree whether a scoped pilot fits your team.
No client material is needed for the walkthrough. Application access is arranged separately.
Who is LegalRAG Pro for?
Solicitors, litigation teams and their colleagues working on substantial documentary matters, where evidence, chronology, versions and review need to stay connected.
Can we start without confidential client documents?
Yes. The walkthrough uses synthetic material. Confidential or privileged use requires agreed information boundaries, appropriate processing arrangements and security due diligence.
Does the AI approve the case position?
No. AI-assisted findings, proposed work and working drafts remain subject to source checking and professional judgement.